题目内容
（请给出正确答案）
[主观题]
He was accused ______ stealing from the shop.A．withB．inC．ofD．at
He was accused ______ stealing from the shop.
A．with
B．in
C．of
D．at
查看答案
如果结果不匹配，请 联系老师 获取答案
题目内容
（请给出正确答案）
如果结果不匹配，请 联系老师 获取答案
题目内容
（请给出正确答案）
He was accused ______ stealing from the shop.
A．with
B．in
C．of
D．at
如果结果不匹配，请 联系老师 获取答案
更多“He was accused ______ stealing…”相关的问题
A.Guilty
B.Innocent
C.Responsible
D.Informed
A.make up with
B.make out
C.make up for
D.make up
【C1】
A．give
B．gives
C．gave
D．given
Started just five years ago by brothers Lee and Alan Jones, the organisation has grown from a small company employing five people to a multi-divisional organisation employing 120 people.
The organisation’s production facility is divided into three separate departments. Each department has a single manager with supervisors assisting on the production lines. The managers and supervisors, all of whom are aware of their roles, work well together. However, although the organisation has grown, the owners continue to involve themselves in day to day activities and this has led to friction between the owners, managers and supervisors.
As a result a problem arose last week. Alan Jones instructed a supervisor to repair a machine on the shop floor, which he refused to do without confirmation and instruction from his departmental manager. The supervisor’s manager,Dean Watkins, became involved and was annoyed at what he saw as interference in his department’s activities. Dean told Alan Jones that he “should have come to me first” because although the responsibility for the overall organisation was a matter for the brothers, action taken in the factory was his through powers that had been delegated to him and through his authority, as manager. In the argument that followed, Alan Jones was accused of failing to understand the way that the hierarchy in such a large organisation operates and that interference with operational decisions by senior management was not helpful.
As a consequence of this, Alan Jones has asked you to explain to him and his brother the issues behind the dispute to clarify the roles of managers and supervisors and to indicate how and why successful delegation might be achieved.
Required:
(a) Explain to Alan Jones the main differences between the work of a manager and that of a supervisor.
(13 marks)
Little Tips for Law-breaking Motorists in Court
Even a careful motorist may have the misfortune to commit a motoring (51) . In due course, (52) a summons (传票) , he will appear in a police court. In the court, the motorist hears his name called by the clerk of the court, and comes forward to identify himself. The magistrate(地方法官) then calls for the policeman who charged the offender and asks him to give evidence. The officer takes the oath to tell the truth, the whole truth and (53) the truth. He also is expected to give an account (54) what happened when the offence was committed and to mention any special circumstances. For instance, the offence (55) partly due to the foolishness of another motorist. It would be unwise for the accused motorist to exaggerate this. It will not help his case to try to blame (56) for his own mistake. The magistrate, (57) hearing that some other motorist is involved, will doubtless say: "What is being done about this man.9 Case coming up later this afternoon, " may (58) be the answer.
(59) you are guilty, it is of course wise to plead guilty and apologize for committing the offence and (60) the court's time. Magistrates are not heartless and a motorist may be lucky enough to hear one say: "There are mitigating circumstances, (61) you have broken the law and I am obliged to (62) a fine. Pay five pounds. Next case. " For many offences if you wish to plead guilty you may do so by post and avoid (63) at all.
Some short-tempered people forget that both policemen and magistrates have a public duty to perform. and are rude to them. This does not pay and rightly so! A magistrate will not let off an offender (64) because he is (65) , but the courteous (有礼貌的) lawbreakers may certainly hope that the magistrate will extend to him what tolerance the law permits.
(51)
A．offence
B．crime
C．mistake
D．accident
The patterns within DNA are unique to each individual, except identical twins, who share the same pattern. The ability to identify these patterns has been used to convict murderers and to clear people who are wrongly accused. It is also used to identify the victims of war and settle disputes over who is the father of a child.
Jeffrey said he and his colleagues made the discovery by accident while tracking genetic variations. But, within six months of the discovery, genetic fingerprinting had been used in an immigration case, to prove that an African boy really was his parents' son. In 1986, it was used for the first time in a British criminal case: It cleared one suspect after being accused of two rapes and murders and helped convict another man.
DNA testing is now very common. In Britain, a national criminal database established in 1995 now contains 2.5 million DNA samples(样本). The U.S. and Canada are developing similar systems. But there are fears about the stored DNA samples and how they could be used to harm a person's privacy. That includes a person's medical history, racial origin or psychological profile. "There is the long-term risk that people can get into these samples and start getting additional information about a person's paternity or risk of disease," Jeffrey said.
DNA testing is not an unfailing proof of identity. Till, it is considered a reasonably reliable system for determining the things it is used for. Jeffrey's estimates(估计) the probability of two individuals' DNA profiles matching in the most commonly used tests at between one in a billion or one in a trillion.
The passage is mainly about ______.
A．the discovery of fingerprinting by Jeffery
B．the practice of fingerprinting in court
C．the fingerprinting in the present situation
D．the merits and demerits of fingerprinting
The young man was accused of______the lady of her money.
A．stealing
B．robbing
C．taking
D．grasping
Even a carefui motorist may have the misfortune to commit a motoring__ 21__ .In due course. having received a summons (传票), he will appear in a police court. In the court,the motorist hears his name called by the clerk of the court, and cormes forward to_ 22__himself. The magistrate (地方法官) then calls for the policeman who_ 23__ the offender and asks him to give evidence. The officer takes the oath to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. He also is expected to give an account__ 24 __what happened when the offence was committed and to mention any special circumstances. For instance the offence__ 25__partly due. to the foolishness of another motorist, It would be unwise for the accused motorist to exaggerate this. It will not help his case to try to blame__26_ for his own mistake. The magistrate, __27_ hearing that some other motorist is invoived, willl doubtless say:What is being done about this man？ "Case coming up later this afternoon, may_ 28_ be the answer. __29__ you are guilty, it is of course wise to plead and apologize for committing the offence and__ 30__ the court&39;s time, Magistrates are not heartless and a motorist may be lucky enough to hear one say:"There are mitigating circumstances, __31__ you have broken the law and I am obliged to impose a fine. Pay five pounds. Next case ". __32_ many of-fences,if you wish to plead guilty you may do so by post and ,avoid__33__ the court at all. Some. shor-tempered people forget that both policemen and magistrates have a public duty to_34 _and arerude to them. This does not pay :and rightly so! A magistrate wil not let off an offender 35 because he is respectable, but the courteous (有礼貌的) lawbreakers may certainly hope that the magistrate will extend to him what tolerance the law permits.
A.offence
B.crime
C.mistake
D.accident
A.identify
B.report
C.prove
D.defend
A.arrested
B.punished
C.scolded
D.charged
A.about
B.for
C.of
D.in
A.should have beem
B.must have been
C.may bave been
D.contd have been
A.someone else
B.something else
C.other someone
D.another someone
A.on
B.as
C.to
D.in
A.as well
B.will
C.as well as
D.just
A.If
B.Unless
C.Although
D.While
A.taking on
B.taking in
C.taking over
D.taking up
A.since
B.as
C.but
D.if
A.For
B.As
C.Like
D.To
A.attending
B.to attend
C.attend
D.having attended
A.act
B.perform
C.carry
D.implement
A.slightly
B.particularly
C.exactly
D.merely
To be sure, vegetarianism dates back to Plato and Plutarch. And in America, the first cruelty busts happened in the late 19th century in New York. But society viewed animals largely as properties, until Regan and a handful of other philosophers pushed animal-rights issues into the academic mainstream. Indeed, this academic focus has dramatically altered how Americans approach the ethics of husbandry, some observers say. Once-radical ideas have been firmly woven into society.
Regan envisions a type of "bill of rights" for animals, including the abandonment of pet ownership, elimination of a meat-based diet, and new standards for biomedical research on animals. Essentially, he wants to establish a new kind of solidarity with animals, and stop animal husbandry altogether. "In addition to the visible achievements and changes, there's been what I might call an invisible revolution taking place, and that revolution is the seriousness with which the issue of animal rights is taken in the academy and in higher education," Regan says.
But with Regan planning to retire in December, a growing number of farmers, doctors, and others are questioning the sustainability of his ideas. Increasingly, Americans who feel their rights have become secondary to animals' rights are speaking out against a wave of arson attacks on farmers and pies thrown in the faces of researchers. Radical groups, with sometimes-violent tactics, have been accused of scaring farmers away from speaking up for traditional agrarian values. Indeed, tensions are only rising between animal-rights activists and groups that have traditionally used the land with an eye toward animals' overall welfare, not their "right" to be happy or to live long lives.
The controversy around Regan is heightened by the fact that he's no pacifist. He says he believes it's OK to break the law for a greater purpose. He calls it the "greater-evil doctrine", the idea that there's moral hierarchy to crime. "I think that you can win in court, and that's what I tell people," Regan says. "I don't believe that you should run and hide." The shift in the level of respect has been "seismic", he says. "Contrary to what a lot of people think, there really has been a recognition that there are some things that human beings should not be permitted to do to animals. Where the human heart has grown is in the recognition of what is to be prohibited."
Regan is called the intellectual leader of the animal-rights movement because
A．he is a philosopher in the field of animal-rights protection.
B．he helps to make animal-rights movement an academic subject.
C．he has written many books on how to protect animal rights.
D．he proves that animal societies have their moral standards as human societies do.
A.luring
B.persuading
C.tempting
D.brainwashing
